Blanche Blinks: Controversial Payouts Scrapped

Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche has now formally killed President Trump’s $1.8 billion “anti-weaponization” fund, under pressure from Republicans just days before a crucial Senate vote.

Story Snapshot

Blanche issued a written order rescinding the fund so it has “no force or effect.”
Two Republican senators had blocked his attorney general confirmation over the fund’s risks and optics.
The fund was designed to pay Americans who said the government was weaponized against them.
The Justice Department now says the settlement’s protections are narrowed and the fund cannot quietly return.

How Blanche’s Order Officially Ends the Fund

Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche signed a one-page order late Sunday that formally rescinds the “Anti-Weaponization Fund,” stating it “is rescinded and shall have no force or effect.” This written move comes after months where Blanche told Congress the Department of Justice was “not moving forward” with the $1.8 billion fund but had resisted putting that promise in a binding document. The new order answers demands for clear legal language, not just verbal assurances from hearings and interviews.

The Department of Justice press office and Blanche’s own post on X said the order terminates the fund that grew out of a settlement with the Internal Revenue Service over leaks of President Trump’s tax records. A companion document also narrows special audit protections tied to that settlement so they apply only to the plaintiffs in the case, including President Trump and his businesses, and not to a wider circle of allies. Taken together, these steps are meant to close off claims that the White House carved out broad special treatment above ordinary taxpayers.

Why Republican Senators Forced the Showdown

Senators John Cornyn and Thom Tillis had put Blanche’s nomination on hold, saying they would not vote to confirm him while the fund still legally existed on paper. They argued the program looked like a taxpayer-funded “slush fund” and wanted a signed order that permanently ended it and limited the settlement’s reach. Cornyn’s spokesperson said Sunday night the senator reached a deal with the Department of Justice that required exactly such an order, clearing the way for a committee vote.

Blanche had already told House and Senate panels that “we’re not moving forward with the fund, period,” describing it as “dead” and a “moot issue.” But judges and lawmakers stressed that oral statements alone did not change the underlying settlement or the earlier Justice Department directive that created the fund. One federal judge even extended an injunction and demanded written proof that the fund was truly off the table, highlighting how much power a signed order carries in high-profile disputes.

What the Anti-Weaponization Fund Was Supposed to Do

The original Justice Department plan called for up to $1.8 billion to compensate people who claimed they were targeted by politically motivated investigations or prosecutions. President Trump had championed the idea as a way to help Americans who saw government “weaponization” against them, including some involved in recent high-profile cases. Blanche defended the concept earlier in the year, saying the reasons for the fund were “as important as they were before,” even as he began to step away from actually launching it.

The proposal quickly sparked backlash in Washington, with critics in both parties saying the program blurred the line between justice and politics and opened the door to payouts for Trump allies with legal troubles. Conservative senators worried the fund’s design would be portrayed as rewards for lawbreakers, not relief for honest citizens hurt by overreach. That criticism shifted the fight from the problem of government weaponization—which many on the right still see as real—to the question of how far the administration should go in writing checks from the Treasury.

What This Means for Conservatives Watching DOJ and Congress

For many conservatives, the story shows both promise and risk inside the Trump-era Justice Department. On one hand, the fund itself grew from a serious concern: that federal agencies have been used to punish political enemies, from tax leaks to partisan investigations. The settlement that created the idea recognized those wrongs and attempted to respond. On the other hand, the way the fund was structured opened it to attacks as a special pot of money instead of a broader fix to deep, long-running bias.

Todd Blanche Rescinds $1.8 Billion Anti-Weaponisation Fund

Read more on…https://t.co/w7XVXQ8Ikg #uspolitics #doj #irssettlement #senatevote #johncornyn #thomtillis #attorneygeneral #NRIPage pic.twitter.com/6FLnOjNDF7

— NriPage (@NRIPage) August 3, 2026

Blanche’s decision to scrap the fund and narrow the settlement suggests congressional oversight can still rein in programs that look like government overreach or self-dealing, even under a conservative administration. At the same time, President Trump has hinted he might try to revive some version of the idea if future battles over confirmation or legislation change the political math, keeping the debate alive inside the party. For now, though, Republicans demanding written accountability have forced the Department of Justice to put its promises on paper, where voters and courts can read them.