Allegations of a “kill everybody” order during Trump-era military operations in the Caribbean have ignited fierce debate over international law and military ethics.
Story Highlights
- The Washington Post alleges Defense Secretary Hegseth ordered no survivors during strikes on alleged drug boats.
- The Pentagon denies the allegations, calling them false narratives.
- Critics raise concerns about potential violations of international law.
- Operations are part of Trump’s intensified counter-narcotics efforts in the Caribbean.
Alleged Orders Question Military Ethics
The Washington Post released a report in November 2025 alleging that U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth verbally commanded SEAL Team Six to “leave no survivors” during operations aimed at drug trafficking vessels in the Caribbean. This operation stems from Trump’s aggressive counter-narcotics strategy targeting vessels suspected of carrying narcotics from Venezuela and Colombia. The report claims two survivors were intentionally targeted after the initial strike, raising ethical and legal questions.
Critics argue this directive, if true, could constitute a breach of international law and military rules of engagement. The Trump administration defends these actions as necessary for protecting American citizens from drug threats. The Pentagon has dismissed the allegations as false, with spokesperson Sean Parnell stating: “This entire narrative is completely false.” The administration maintains that these operations were conducted to eliminate threats posed by narco-terrorist organizations.
Trump Administration’s Stance
President Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio have consistently defended the operations. They assert that the vessels targeted were integral parts of narco-terrorist organizations threatening the U.S. Trump first announced the strikes in September 2025, labeling the vessels as heavily loaded with narcotics. Rubio confirmed the vessels’ destruction, emphasizing their association with designated terrorist groups. Critics, however, question the legality and morality of such aggressive tactics.
Despite the criticism, the administration insists that the operations were essential to national security. Intelligence assessments reportedly grew more confident in identifying drug cargoes, though critics question the adequacy of threat assessments. The controversy has sparked intense debate within Congress, with some members expressing concerns over the lack of oversight and potential legal violations.
Concerns Over International Law
The allegations have intensified scrutiny over the operations’ adherence to international law. Senator Mark Warner expressed concerns about the potential risks posed to American sailors if international law is violated. The operations have also sparked diplomatic tensions, with Colombian officials asserting that the casualties may have included Colombian nationals. Despite these claims, the White House has disputed such assertions, maintaining their stance on the necessity of the operations.
These events may set a precedent for future military actions in international waters, highlighting the delicate balance between national security and adherence to international norms. The allegations could prompt a reevaluation of military protocols and the ethical implications of counter-narcotics operations.
Sources:
2025 United States military strikes on alleged drug traffickers
