Furious Debate Over UK’s VPN Restrictions

A new policy threatens VPN access for minors, igniting a crucial debate on privacy versus child protection.

Story Highlights

  • The UK House of Lords voted to ban VPNs for children under 18.
  • The amendment to the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill passed 207-159.
  • Consultations on child online safety and VPN restrictions are underway.
  • Critics warn of broad age verification and potential privacy erosion.

UK Lords Vote to Ban VPNs for Minors

On January 21, 2026, the UK House of Lords passed an amendment to the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill, prohibiting VPN provision to children under 18. This move aims to prevent minors from bypassing the Online Safety Act’s age verification measures. The amendment, sponsored by Lord Nash and others, passed with a vote of 207-159. This decision reflects growing scrutiny over privacy tools that enable minors to circumvent child protection laws.

This legislative action follows the July 2025 implementation of the Online Safety Act, which mandates age verification for adult sites. Despite these measures, VPN usage surged as minors sought ways to evade these restrictions. The amendment’s supporters, including Baroness Benjamin and Baroness Cass, emphasize the need for stronger enforcement to ensure child safety online.

Consultations and Criticisms

The government has announced a three-month consultation to explore VPN restrictions further. Technology Secretary Liz Kendall emphasizes an evidence-based approach, involving parents, tech firms, and safety groups. However, critics like Baroness Kidron argue that the consultation is a delay tactic, benefiting tech lobbyists rather than protecting children. Meanwhile, some Conservatives, including Kemi Badenoch, demand immediate bans without delay.

While the Lords’ amendment gained momentum, it must now face debate in the Commons, where the Labour majority may challenge it. Despite this, cross-party support for child protection measures could pressure the government to act swiftly. The ongoing consultation will also consider data harvesting curbs and social media restrictions for minors.

Impact on Privacy and the Tech Sector

The potential ban on VPNs for minors raises significant concerns about privacy and digital security. Critics warn that such measures could lead to widespread age verification across the internet, impacting privacy rights. Additionally, VPN providers may face compliance challenges and market limitations within the UK. The debate also illustrates the broader tension between child safety initiatives and preserving individual privacy.

As the UK navigates these complex issues, the outcome of the Commons debate and consultation will be pivotal. The implications extend beyond national borders, aligning with global trends of restricting privacy tools for enhanced child safety. The potential normalization of these restrictions highlights the ongoing struggle to balance security with fundamental freedoms.

Sources:

UK Lords Vote to Ban VPNs for Children as Pressure on Privacy Tools Increases

UK Government Targets VPNs in New Online Safety Consultation as Lords Vote for Ban

The UK House of Lords Supports Amendment to Restrict Social Media Access for Under-16s

House of Lords Votes to Ban Under-16 Social Media