
A judge’s ruling has allowed ‘Serial’ podcast subject Adnan Syed to remain free despite his murder conviction still standing, igniting new controversy in a case that has captivated America for decades. The decision marks another twist in one of the most publicized potential wrongful conviction cases in recent memory.
At a Glance
- Baltimore judge reduced Adnan Syed’s sentence to time served under a new Maryland juvenile sentencing law
- Syed remains convicted of murdering ex-girlfriend Hae Min Lee but won’t return to prison
- Judge determined Syed is not a danger to the public after his release in 2022
- Syed will serve five years of supervised probation while working at Georgetown University
- Lee’s family opposes the decision and wants Syed to take responsibility for the crime
Liberal Sentencing Reform Benefits Convicted Killer
Baltimore City Circuit Court Judge Jennifer Schiffer has reduced Adnan Syed’s sentence to time served under a 2021 Maryland law that allows for sentence reductions for individuals who committed crimes as juveniles. Syed, whose case gained worldwide attention through the “Serial” podcast, will remain free despite his murder conviction being reinstated following procedural challenges.
Syed was convicted in 1999 for the murder of his former high school girlfriend, Hae Min Lee, and originally sentenced to life plus 30 years. Despite maintaining his innocence throughout, his conviction was upheld by Maryland’s appellate court after a brief period when it had been overturned. The case has become a rallying point for criminal justice reform advocates despite the prosecution’s insistence on Syed’s guilt.
Adnan Syed will not serve any more time for his first-degree murder conviction in the 1999 killing of Hae Min Lee, a Baltimore Circuit judge ruled Thursday. Read more: https://t.co/8fD8fdRuZn
📸: Kevin Richardson, The Baltimore Sun pic.twitter.com/W3Ymf4zCiy
— The Baltimore Sun (@baltimoresun) March 6, 2025
Victim’s Family Left Without Justice
The Lee family has repeatedly opposed any reduction in Syed’s sentence, expressing ongoing grief and outrage at what they see as a failure of the justice system. Their attorney has pointed to misleading information used to support Syed’s previous release and the lack of accountability in the case, which has devastated the victim’s loved ones for over two decades.
“We now know there was never any new information that called into question Adnan Syed’s guilty verdict,” David Sanford said.
Lee’s family succeeded in having Syed’s conviction reinstated after his brief release in 2022, arguing they received insufficient notice to attend a crucial hearing. They remain steadfast in their belief in Syed’s guilt and have asked him to take responsibility for his actions, something he has refused to do despite the conviction standing in the legal record.
Adnan Syed will not serve any more time for his first-degree murder conviction in the 1999 killing of Hae Min Lee, a Baltimore Circuit judge ruled Thursday.
Judge Jennifer B. Schiffer said in her Thursday afternoon ruling that Syed, now 43, “is not a danger to the public,”… pic.twitter.com/qxMKVcQLnG
— FOX Baltimore (@FOXBaltimore) March 6, 2025
Controversial Legal Decisions
Baltimore’s current state’s attorney, Ivan Bates, has taken a middle position in the contentious case, supporting the jury’s guilty verdict while also agreeing with the sentence reduction. The office withdrew the previous motion to vacate Syed’s conviction entirely but did not oppose his continued release, a decision that has frustrated the victim’s family.
“After considering the entire record, the court concludes that the Defendant is not a danger to the public and that the interests of justice will be better served by a reduced sentence,” Judge Jennifer Schiffer wrote.
Since his release, Syed has been working at Georgetown University’s Prisons and Justice Initiative, a fact his supporters point to as evidence of his rehabilitation. His attorney, Erica Suter, expressed joy at the decision while highlighting what she considers Syed’s positive contributions. Meanwhile, the legal system’s handling of the case continues to divide public opinion about whether justice has truly been served.
This can’t be right…right?