How TikTok Tackles Disinformation During Romanian Elections to Protect Integrity

TikTok’s latest crackdown on election interference in Romania exposes a shocking web of political manipulation, raising urgent questions about the platform’s ability to safeguard democratic processes.

At a Glance

  • TikTok dismantled three influence campaigns during Romania’s elections, including one linked to Kremlin-backed Sputnik
  • The platform removed networks promoting ultranationalist Călin Georgescu and independent candidate Mircea Geoană
  • TikTok defended its actions before the European Parliament amid criticism of content mishandling
  • Romanian authorities have requested an EU investigation into TikTok’s compliance with social media laws

TikTok’s Decisive Action Against Election Interference

In a move it describes as protecting the integrity of Romania’s electoral process, TikTok has taken down multiple networks of accounts engaged in what it sees as political meddling. The platform’s intervention came at a crucial time, between the presidential election’s first round and the parliamentary vote on December 1.

The scale of the alleged interference is large. TikTok removed two campaigns targeting Romanian voters and dismantled a campaign linked to Sputnik, a known Kremlin-backed media outlet. The Sputnik-affiliated network alone boasted nearly 140,000 followers, highlighting the potential reach and impact of such coordinated “disinformation” efforts.

The Rise of TikTok in Political Discourse

The platform’s role in shaping political narratives has come under intense scrutiny, particularly following the unexpected success of ultranationalist candidate Călin Georgescu. His popularity on TikTok has raised eyebrows and sparked concerns about the platform’s influence on voter behavior. Researchers and regulators suspect that fake accounts or paid influencers may have artificially boosted Georgescu’s messaging, potentially skewing the electoral landscape.

TikTok’s defense of its election approach, citing 95 Romanian content moderators, fails to address the core issue of its algorithms’ potential to amplify divisive or misleading content. The platform’s ability to rapidly disseminate information, coupled with its popularity among younger demographics, makes it a powerful tool for political messaging – both legitimate and nefarious.

Regulatory Scrutiny and TikTok’s Response

The Romanian government’s request for a European Commission investigation into TikTok’s compliance with EU social media laws signals a growing concern over the platform’s role in shaping political discourse. This move, coupled with the ongoing probe into TikTok’s content moderation policies, puts the company under intense regulatory pressure.

TikTok’s testimony before the European Parliament was a clear attempt to address allegations of mishandling political content. However, the company’s assurances of regulatory alignment seem to fall short in the face of persistent concerns about its content moderation practices and the potential for foreign interference through its platform.

The Broader Implications for Democracy

As social media platforms increasingly become the primary source of political information for many voters, there are questions about a platform’s role and “responsibility.” The ease with which foreign actors, like the Kremlin-backed Sputnik, can reach and potentially influence large audiences through these platforms is a cause for concern.

RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR